What's All The Fuss Over Bank Charges?

If you've been keeping an eye on the media over thesimply by asking for them back. As these repayments
last few months, especially the parts of it coveringhave sometimes run into four figures or more, and the
personal finance, you can't fail to have noticed thebanks concerned agreed to the refunds without
huge row over bank charges. Stories abound ofrecourse to legal action, the implication could well be
customers reclaiming thousands in backdated feesthat even the banks are unsure what the true legality
from their banks, and with consumer groups, activists,of the situation is.
and government regulators squaring up towardsThankfully, the matter should soon be clarified with the
seemingly intransigent banks, the stage is set for ainstigation of a test case to decide whether the
battle that could affect the financial future of everyonecharges are fair, or punitive and illegal. There is now an
who makes use of financial services. But what is theembargo imposed by most banks on refunding
hoo-haa all about?disputed charges, pending the outcome of the case. If
The basic accusation laid against the banking industrythe banks lose, the floodgates could open, and the
is that the various charges levied on customers whocosts could run into millions.
go overdrawn, miss repayments, or commit otherWould this be a good thing for customers?
misdemeanours are excessive. Under the financialWell, should the banks be faced with multi-million pound
services industry regulations laid down by government,refunds because the decision goes against them, the
any such charges must only be of sufficient size tomoney will have to be found from somewhere. And
cover the administrative costs the banks incur bythat's without considering the further millions of pounds
dealing with miscreant customers. Many outside theof income the banks will lose if charges are drastically
banking industry think that this isn't what's happening,reduced. Already, there are monthly or annual fees
and that banks are inflating their charges to punitivebeing introduced for current accounts, credit cards, and
levels, and using them as profit makers - both of whichother financial services - irrespective of whether the
are illegal under current laws.customer goes overdrawn or otherwise breaks the
Naturally, the banks dispute such accusations, althoughterms of their agreement.
when the row first blew up in the arena of credit cardMake no mistake: the banking industry won't allow
late payment charges, and the regulators insisted thatdefeat to erode their profits, and the lost revenue will
these charges be slashed, all banks promptly agreedbe reclaimed from somewhere else. It may well be
to do so.that mainstream banking customers will have to pay a
Further, in many cases, bank customers have beenfee to subsidise lower charges for those who bank
able to reclaim past charges for going overdrawn,less responsibly.